Legal Opinion

Morford v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 10, 1950No. 236PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case the trial court did not permit counsel for petitioner to interrogate prospective government employee jurors upon voir dire examination with specific reference to the possible influence of the “Loyalty Order,” Executive Order No. 9835, on their ability to render a just and impartial verdict. Such questioning was permitted in Dennis v. United States, ante, p. 162; see n. 4 of the Court’s opinion, ante, pp. 170-171.

We said in Dennis that “Preservation of the opportunity to prove actual bias is a guarantee of a defendant’s right to an impartial jury.” Ante, pp. 171-172. Since that…

2Cited by70 opinions

  1. Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. United States v. DennisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  3. United States v. Leonard T. Robinson, United States of America v. James E. McCaffity United States of America v. Louis JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. Walter Augustus Bowe, Robert Steele Collier, and Khaleel Sultarn SayyedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  5. State v. Azad Haji AbdullahIdaho Supreme Court · 2015

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API