Legal Opinion

In Re Tarpley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 12, 1974PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

300 So.2d 409 (1974)

In re Ex parte William T. TARPLEY, Petitioner.

In re Kathe E. TAPLEY

v.

LIBERTY SUPER MARKETS OF BIRMINGHAM, Alabama.

Ex parte Ingram BEASLEY, Judge of the Tenth Judicial Circuit.

SC 752.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

September 12, 1974.

Michael W. McCormick and David Cromwell Johnson, Birmingham, for petitioner.

Douglas Arant and Brittin T. Coleman, Birmingham, for respondent.

JONES, Justice.

The respondent, Dr. William T. Tarpley, was found guilty of contempt of court for failure to appear as a witness pursuant to an "on call" subpoena in the case of Kathe E. Tapley v. Liberty Super…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Ex Parte BankheadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  5. Tapley v. Liberty Super MarketsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Opinion of the ClerkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  2. Int'l. Bro. of Elec. Wkrs. v. Davis Const. & EngineersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  3. Charles Mfg. Co. v. United Furniture WorkersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  4. Lawless v. SmithCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  5. Reiman v. BreslinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API