Legal Opinion
Papyrus Technology Corp. v. New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 11, 2008No. 04 CV 00625(JMB)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JUDITH M. BARZILAY, District Judge * .
I. Background. cn o CD
A. Procedural History cu o CD
II. Legal Background .510
III. Discussion . H i-H lO
A. The Technology Described in the Patents . H i — i uo
B. The '877 Patent. (M t-H io
1. “Managing one or more floor brokers” CO t — I uo
2. “Current-status information”. lO ^ — 1 uo
3. “Current-status information” in the Transmitting, Calculating, and Displaying Steps.
4. The Calculating Step CR l — 1 00
5. The Displaying Step. CR tO O
6. The Selecting Step .. CR to CO
7. “Transmitting” and “Transmitting ... from [one device] to [another…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Papyrus Technology Corp. v. New York Stock Exchange, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Dynamics Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Tripathy v. FeuzDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2023