Legal Opinion

Dynamics Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 31, 2025No. 1:19-cv-06479Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DYNAMICS INC., Plaintiff, 19-CV-6479 (JPO) -v- OPINION AND ORDER SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al., Defendants. J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: Dynamics Inc. (“Dynamics”) brings this action against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and various affiliates (collectively, “Samsung”) alleging infringement of US Patent No. 8,827,153 (the “’153 Patent”). Before the Court now are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, Samsung’s motion is granted and Dynamics’s motion is denied. I. Background A. Factual…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. 02 Micro International Ltd. v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API