Legal Opinion

In re Elysium Health-Chromadex Litig.

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided January 3, 2019No. 17 Civ. 7394 (CM)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMahon, C.J.:

On September 27, 2017, Plaintiff Elysium Health, Inc. ("Elysium") filed a complaint ("Complaint") against Defendant *333Chromadex, Inc. ("CMDX"), alleging violations of § 43(a) of the Lanham Act, as well as state law claims of trade libel, deceptive business practices under New York General Business Law § 349, and tortious interference with prospective economic relations.

Presently before the Court is CMDX's Motion for Summary Judgment based on a claim of immunity under the Noerr - Pennington doctrine.

For the reasons that follow, CMDX's Motion is GRANTED.

I. Background

The Court…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. 360 Mortgage Group, LLC v. Fortress Investment Group LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
  2. Actava TV, Inc. v. Joint Stock Company "Channel One Russia Worldwide"District Court, S.D. New York · 2024
  3. Kaufman LLC v. Estate of Herbert FeinbergDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API