In re Elysium Health-Chromadex Litig.
District Court, S.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
McMahon, C.J.:
On September 27, 2017, Plaintiff Elysium Health, Inc. ("Elysium") filed a complaint ("Complaint") against Defendant *333Chromadex, Inc. ("CMDX"), alleging violations of § 43(a) of the Lanham Act, as well as state law claims of trade libel, deceptive business practices under New York General Business Law § 349, and tortious interference with prospective economic relations.
Presently before the Court is CMDX's Motion for Summary Judgment based on a claim of immunity under the Noerr - Pennington doctrine.
For the reasons that follow, CMDX's Motion is GRANTED.
I. Background
The Court…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- 360 Mortgage Group, LLC v. Fortress Investment Group LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Actava TV, Inc. v. Joint Stock Company "Channel One Russia Worldwide"District Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Kaufman LLC v. Estate of Herbert FeinbergDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024