Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum (Ed Marger) (Dennis Merenbach). Robert Kent Lahodny, Movant-Appellant v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 21, 1982No. 82-5817PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POOLE, Circuit Judge:
The district court denied the motion of Robert Kent Lahodny, appellant, to quash grand jury subpoenas duces tecum served on two attorneys who formerly represented him. We affirm.
Ordinarily, appellate jurisdiction to review a denial of a motion to quash a grand jury subpoena does not lie until the person to whom the subpoena is directed has first resisted the order and has been found in contempt. United States v. Ryan, 402 U.S. 530, 91 S.Ct. 1580, 29 L.Ed.2d 85 (1970); Cobbledick v. United States, 309 U.S. 323, 60 S.Ct. 540, 84 L.Ed. 783 (1940). However, an immediate…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Perlman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Baird v. KoernerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings in the Matter of Jeffrey Fine. Appeal of Unnamed Grand Jury TargetCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Dated December 10, 1987. Does I Through IV v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- In Re GRAND JURY INVESTIGATIONCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Certain Complaints Under Investigation by an Investigating Committee of Judicial Council of Eleventh Circuit. v. MercerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Stephen Tornay, Galene Tornay v. United States of America A.R. Demeter, Special Agent, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.