Legal Opinion · Dissent

Matter of Estate of Kerr

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 1996No. 16505Published

1DissentHartz, Judge

25. I join in Chief Judge Apodaca’s opinion except on two matters.

26. First, although I agree that the wills executed by Mr. and Mrs. Kerr were mutual wills, my analysis of the matter is a bit different from that adopted by the majority. In my view, the issue is not sufficiency of the evidence. Rather, the issue is how to interpret certain written documents — the wills. After all, the historical facts are not disputed. The authenticity of the wills was not challenged. Therefore, the sole question is whether the language in the wills created a contract between the testators requiring the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Perschbacher v. MoseleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Lich v. CarlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Silvers v. Estate of SilversDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API