Johnson v. Hattrem

Defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff for the sum of $670, together with interest and costs. The action was tried without the intervention of a jury. The trial court made findings of fact upon all the material issues in the case. The evidence established and the trial court, in effect, found that one D. Aim contracted with defendant, W. A. Hattrem, to construct a dwelling-house for him and furnish all labor and material necessary to complete the same for which it was stipulated he should be paid a specified sum and Aim entered into a 'subcontract with plaintiff whereby it…