Legal Opinion
Berry v. Armstrong Rubber Co.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided July 30, 1991No. Civ. A. J88-0653(B)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BARBOUR, Chief Judge.
This cause is before the Court on the Motion of Defendant Armstrong Rubber Company (“Armstrong”) for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Having considered the Motion together with the supporting and opposing memoranda, exhibits, and documentation, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion of Defendant for Summary Judgment should be granted for the reasons as set forth below.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiffs’ homes are located on two lots in the Mayfair subdivision in Natchez, Mississippi…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jules R. Viterbo, Et Ux, (Patricia Viterbo) v. The Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Kennett-Murray Corporation v. John E. BoneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Lillian Washington, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Arsane Washington v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Donald v. Amoco Production Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999
- Rosenblatt v. Exxon Co., U.S.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- James Berry, Sr., James Berry, Sr. v. The Armstrong Rubber Company, J. Wesley Cooper v. The Armstrong Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Reeves v. HopkinsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1994
- Ketzel v. Mississippi Riverboat Amusement, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.