Legal Opinion
Common School District No. 102 v. Consolidated School District No. 111-74
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 21, 1927No. 25,676PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
The appeal is from the order denying plaintiff a new trial.
Both parties are public school districts in Dakota county, defendant also embracing a part of Scott county. The suit is to recover the taxes derived from four eighties and eight platted lots in Dakota county which are claimed to be a part of plaintiff’s territory and which taxes defendant wrongfully received.
Section 2790, G-. S. 1923, pertaining to public school districts reads: “All districts shall be composed of adjoining territory, and any part of a district not so situated, and not containing a school house used as such, shall be…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Evens v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- State v. HonerudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- State ex rel. Childs v. School District No. 152Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Hammer v. NarverudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- In re Appeal of Common School Districts Nos. 16, 45 & 94Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bricelyn School District No. 132 v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952