Legal Opinion
Phyllis Gorham, Claimant v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided August 6, 2019No. 18-cv-853-SMPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Phyllis Gorham, Claimant Case No. 18-cv-853-SM v. Opinion No.
2019 DNH 124
Andrew Saul, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant O R D E R Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), claimant, Phyllis Gorham, moves to reverse the Commissioner’s decision denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act (the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 423, and Supplemental Security Income Benefits under Title XVI of the Act,
42 U.S.C. §§ 1381-1383(c). The Commissioner objects and moves for an order affirming the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gorham v. US Social Security Administration, Acting CommissionerDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2019