Legal Opinion

Gorham v. US Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided August 6, 2019No. 1:18-cv-00853Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Phyllis Gorham, Claimant Case No. 18-cv-853-SM v. Opinion No.

2019 DNH 124

Andrew Saul, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant O R D E R Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), claimant, Phyllis Gorham, moves to reverse the Commissioner’s decision denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act (the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 423, and Supplemental Security Income Benefits under Title XVI of the Act,

42 U.S.C. §§ 1381-1383(c). The Commissioner objects and moves for an order affirming the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API