Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

York Bank & Trust Co. v. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 29, 1988No. 87-5792Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partStapleton, Circuit Judge

I agree with my colleagues that York Bank’s complaint states a claim for insurance proceeds and that, accordingly, this case should be remanded to the district court for further proceedings. I write separately because I believe the district court should conduct a de novo proceeding as it would in any other suit to recover insurance proceeds.

As the court’s opinion appears to acknowledge, the APA’s provisions for judicial review of agency actions are not intended to preempt adequate judicial reme*642dies created by Congress in other federal legislation. 5 U.S.C. § 704 (1982); see, e.g., Alabama…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alabama Rural Fire Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Frank Naylor, Associate Administrator of the Farmers Home AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. Jugum v. Federal Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1986
  3. Herbert v. National Credit Union Admin. Bd.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API