Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Faheem-El v. Klincar

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 25, 1988No. 85-3008Published

1ConcurrenceCummings, Circuit Judge

While not departing from the views I expressed for the panel in Faheem-El v. Klincar, 814 F.2d 461 (7th Cir.1987), I concur in Judge Flaum’s opinion because it permits Judge Moran “to determine whether due process requires Illinois to furnish additional procedures to protect a parolee’s liberty interest.” This does not rule out the Faheem-El panel suggestion that due process requires early conditional release consideration for parolees arrested on new criminal charges. 814 F.2d at 477. Both Faheem-El’s and the class’ true complaint is not that as parolees they have an absolute right to bail…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. John Allan CrawleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  3. Faheem-El v. KlincarCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API