Faheem-El v. Klincar
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.
We are asked whether, consistent with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, a state may deny every parolee who is arrested on a new criminal charge any consideration for release prior to the final revocation hearing. In Morris*463sey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 92 S.Ct. 2593, 33 L.Ed.2d 484 the Supreme Court decided that parolees have a significant liberty interest in maintaining their conditional freedom. Thus the Court held that the Due Process Clause requires certain procedures including hearings prior to revocation of parole but it declined to hold that the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- West Allis Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Champion Parts Rebuilders, Inc. v. Cormier Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
- Faheem-El v. KlincarCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Faheem-El v. KlincarCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Faheem-El v. KlincarCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.