Legal Opinion
Harbaugh v. Utz
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 30, 1958No. 5062PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtFess, J.
Appellee moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the notice thereof was not filed within the time provided by law.
On February 7,1957, the court made the following entry on its trial docket:
“February 7, parties present with counsel. Jury waived; stenographer ordered. Trial had. Finding in favor of plaintiffs and against defendants and damages assessed at one hun dred dollars ($100) and costs. Judgment on findings. (Signed) Judge Macelwane.”
On the same day, the docket entry was recorded on the journal by the clerk. Counsel for the parties were unaware of the journalization by the clerk…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Feeter v. . ArkenburghNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Wells v. WellsOhio Court of Appeals · 1922
- Boedker v. Warren E. Richards Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1931
- Holcomb, Aud. v. State, Ex Rel.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
- Tims v. Holland Furnace Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ohio Department of Natural Resources v. HughesOhio Court of Appeals · 2001