Legal Opinion

Hufsmith v. Weaver

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 29, 1987No. Nos. 86-1960, 86-1978PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAGILL, Circuit Judge.

This is the second trip that Razorback Ready Mix Concrete Company, Inc. (“Razorback”) and defendants-appellees, competitors of Razorback, have made to this court. In Razorback Ready Mix Concrete Co. v. Weaver, 761 F.2d 484 (8th Cir.1985) (“Razorback I”), we held as a matter of law, as to Razorback’s Sherman Act claim, that the “sham exception” to the NoerrPennington doctrine was inapplicable to the defendants’ lawsuits opposing the issuance of certain tax-exempt industrial revenue bonds which would have benefited *457Razorback. Id. at 487.1 This court thus vacated the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Porous Media Corporation v. Pall CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  2. Lane v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  3. Murphy v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  4. Lane v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  5. Murphy v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API