New York Telephone Co. v. Beckers
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtSwan, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). At the close of the plaintiffs’ case, and again at the close of all the evidence, the defendant made the customary motions to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that no negligence- had been proved against the defendant, and that Beckers had affirmatively shown himself guilty of contributory negligence. The motions were denied, and those issues were decided adversely to the defendant by the verdict of a jury. We are now asked to set aside that verdict. This an appellate court cannot do, unless there is no credible evidence from which the conclusion of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Knapp v. . BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Weigand v. . United Traction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Ward v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Dolfini v. . Erie R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Major v. DavenportMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
- Russell v. DavisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. Co. v. the WC HarmsDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1954
- Union Indemnity Co. v. LeidesdorfCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Wilson v. Lehigh Valley R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.