Legal Opinion
Roybal v. Bates Lumber Company
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided March 28, 1966No. 7669PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COMPTON, Justice.
The widow of Felipe Roybal, deceased, on behalf of herself and decedent’s minor children, instituted this action against Bates Lumber Company, hereinafter referred to as Bates, and Apache, Inc., hereinafter referred to as Apache, as employers, and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, hereinafter referred to as insurer, to recover workmen’s compensation benefits for the death of the decedent allegedly arising out of and in the course of his employment. At the trial Apache was dismissed as a party to the action and the cause was prosecuted against Bates and insurer. The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Burruss v. B. M. C. Logging Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
- Jernigan v. New Amsterdam Casualty CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Latta v. HarveyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
- Shaver v. BellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- Campbell v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Harger v. Structural Services, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Jelso v. World Balloon Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
- Ulibarri Landscaping Material, Inc. v. Colony Materials, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
- Yerbich Ex Rel. Yerbich v. HealdNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- Burton v. Crawford and CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.