Legal Opinion

Tadlock v. Smith

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1934No. 3986PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff, a member of the board of trustees of the village of Santa Rosa, and as well a taxpayer and elector, has sued to enjoin the village clerk from recognizing Jose N. Armijo and others as judges and clerks for the ensuing village election, and from delivering to them the election supplies and official ballots, and for mandatory injunction commanding that such recognition be accorded and delivery made to J. M. Moreno and others. He has appealed from a judgment dismissing the complaint. .

Plaintiff challenges the right of Armijo and his associates, as having 'been named by the mayor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Asplund v. HannettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Guadalupe Co. Com'rs v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Jaramillo v. State Ex Rel. Board of County Com'rsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. PattenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  2. State Ex Rel. Overton v. New Mexico State Tax CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Laumbach v. Board of County Commissioners of San Miguel CountyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  4. State Ex Rel. Los Alamos Assessor v. State Tax CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Olson v. GrillyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API