Legal Opinion
Guillermo Eduardo Ramirez-Peyro v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States of America
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 23, 2007No. 06-1569PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Guillermo Ramirez-Peyro (Ramirez) sought asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT), claiming that if he were returned to his native Mexico he would be harmed or killed in retaliation for his work as an informant for United States agents. The immigration judge granted him deferral of removal under CAT, but the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) reversed and ordered Ramirez removed to Mexico. Ramirez petitions for review, arguing that the Board applied the incorrect standard of review. We remand for further…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Gonzales v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Y-LBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2002
- S-VBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2000
- Quang Ly Tran v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Imad Ibrahim Mouawad v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Ramirez-Peyro v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Go v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Rotinsulu v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Kabba v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.