Legal Opinion

Martin Oil & Gas Co. v. Fyffe

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 5, 1933PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Creal, Commissioner

Affirming in part and reversing in part.

The Martin Oil & Gas Company, a corporation, is appealing from a judgment in favor of J. H. Fyffe and Proctor Fyffe for breach of a drilling contract. The judgment is for $1,000 for each of the two wells mentioned in the contract. The pertinent facts as made to appear from the record are that on Januray 8, 1930, appellant and appellees entered into a written contract, the relevant portions of which read:

“Witnesseth: That the parties hereto, for and in consideration of their mutual covenants hereby agree as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fox v. BuckinghamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  2. Louisville Tobacco Warehouse Co. v. ZeiglerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  3. Jones v. RiddellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. Sower v. LillardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
  5. United Equipment Co. v. D. T. Bohon Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. D. L. Walker & Co. v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  2. Cox v. VentersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1994
  3. Stephens v. HornCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
  4. Behr Systems, Inc. v. Envirometric Process Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  5. J&H Lanmark, Inc. v. Twin City Fire Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API