Legal Opinion
Stockton v. Board of Com'rs of Pittsburg County
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 20, 1938No. 27697PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
This case is presented to us on appeal from the district court of Pitts-burg county.
M. L. Stockton, as the owner of lot 26 (containing approximately five acres) of townsite No. 4, county of Pittsburg, state of Oklahoma, presented his application to the district court requesting that court to make an order vacating a portion of the plat of said “townsite No. 4.” The portion of the plat sought to be vacated consisted of lot 26 and a strip 30 feet in width running the length of said lot along the west side thereof and designated as a “roadway.”
The townsite addition is adjacent to but not within…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McKeever Drilling Co. v. EgbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Sheridan Oil Co. v. Superior Court of Creek CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- City of Tulsa v. AaronsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Bohnsack v. Ponca City Development Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Oklahoma City v. KelseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
3Cited by5 opinions
- State and Diver v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Kennedy v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Red Rock Petroleum Co. v. City of ChoctawCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
- SUBURBAN REALTY CO. v. CANTLEYCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2021
- State and Diver v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1933