Legal Opinion
Condon v. Condon
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 11, 2007PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated July 31, 2000, the former husband appeals, by permission, as limited by his brief, from so much of a qualified domestic relations order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Krauss, J.), dated April 11, 2006, as directed that the former wife receive a portion of his “retirement allowance” in accordance with the formula set forth in Majauskas v Majauskas (61 NY2d 481 [1984]), and directed that the retirement allowance include cost-of-living adjustments.
Ordered that the qualified domestic relations order is modified, on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- McCoy v. FeinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Pagliaro v. PagliaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3Cited by9 opinions
- Berardi v. BerardiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Nugent-Schubert v. SchubertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Marino v. MarinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Van Orden v. Van OrdenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Mondshein v. MondsheinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.