Legal Opinion
Patrick N. CAROSELLA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 14, 1987No. Appeal 86-1207PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
Patrick N. Carosella, a supervisory employee of the United States Postal Service (the “agency”), was removed from his position based on charges of sexual harassment and soliciting deviation from official reporting time. The Merit Systems Protection Board (the “Board”) sustained the removal, holding that the penalty was reasonable under the circumstances and that removal promoted the efficiency of the federal service. Carosella v. United States Postal Service, 30 M.S.P.R. 199 (1986).
The Sexual Harassment Charge
The Postal Service defined sexual harassment in its…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Barbara J. HENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DUNDEE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Loyce E. Hayes v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Katz v. DoleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- Richard J. Griessenauer v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- David POPE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- James B. King, Director, Office of Personnel Management v. Phillip G. Hillen and Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Donald C. Newton v. Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Kelvin R. Holland v. Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Joseph L. HOWARD, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the AIR FORCE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.