Smith v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice.
The plaintiffs 1 bring this appeal from summary judgment for two of the defendants in the action — Westinghouse Electric Corporation [Westinghouse] and Monsanto Company [Monsanto] — grounded on the bar of limitation prescribed in 12 O.S. 1981 § 109. 2 The cited statute provides that an action may not be commenced against any person performing or furnishing the “design, planning, supervision or observation of construction or construction of an improvement to real property” more than 10 years after the improvement has been substantially completed.
The dispositive issue for our…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mullis v. Southern Co. Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Witherspoon v. Sides Const. Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- Schwartz v. DiehlSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Russell v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Getty Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Jackson v. Oklahoma Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.