Legal Opinion

Fields v. Macnab

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 26, 1984No. 17573; CA A30222PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Plaintiff, an out-of-state broker, appeals a summary judgment that dismissed his action to recover a real estate commission from Oregon sellers and an Oregon broker. We affirm.

This case represents another attempt by a non-Oregon real estate broker to avoid the effect of this state’s statutory licensing requirements. The record on summary judgment is viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff, the party opposing the motion. Viewed in that light, the record indicates that plaintiff is a Washington real estate broker, who is not licensed to do business in Oregon. In June or July, 1980,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Jolma v. SteinbockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. CERTIFIED REALTY COMPANY v. ReddickOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Blank v. Far West Federal SavingsOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Carnahan v. McCarverOregon Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bowlerama, Inc. v. Woodside Realty Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Bowlerama, Inc. v. Woodside Realty Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Bowlerama, Inc. v. Woodside Realty Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API