Legal Opinion
Bowlerama, Inc. v. Woodside Realty Co.
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided April 6, 1988No. 86-317PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARDINE, Justice.
Sadly, this case is illustrative of the changing mores of a society that, with increasing frequency, feels no obligation to honor its agreements. Greg Anderson and Daniel Graeber, owners of all of the stock of Bowlerama, Inc., seek here to renege on their promise and recover back an agreed commission paid upon the sale of their bowling alley.
*1379Appellant sued Woodside Realty and Ronald M. Swearingen to recover a real estate commission in the sum of $61,000, claiming technical violation of the Wyoming Real Estate License Act of 1971, Section 33-28-114(b), W.S.1977. This appeal is…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hurst v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- Hagar v. MobleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- Olson v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- Schepps v. HoweWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- Bell v. United Farm Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Furr v. Fonville Morisey Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Van Zanen v. Qwest Wireless, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Sievers v. Barton Ex Rel. Estate of BartonWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Bowlerama, Inc. v. Woodside Realty Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- Richardson v. SchaubWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.