Boyd v. Winte
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; Geo. W. Clark, Judge. Action by Charles Winte against A. W. Boyd and T. M. Daniel and wife, in which H. F. Yulbrock and another filed cross-petitions against defendants. Judgment for plaintiff and cross-petitioners, and defendant A. W. Boyd brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUMMONS, C.
This action was commenced in the district court of Oklahoma county by the defendant, in error, Chas. Winte, against T. M. Daniel and wife, and the plaintiff in error, to recover upon a promissory note executed by T. M. Daniel and wife and to foreclose a mortgage upon real estate in Oklahoma county to secure the same. The defendants in error H. F. Vul-brock and S. M. Gloyd filed cross-petitions to recover upon notes executed by T. M. Daniel and wife and to foreclose a mortgage upon said real estate to secure the same. Recovery was sought against the plaintiff in error…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McCoy v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Tribal Development Co. v. White Bros.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co. v. Walton Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Flesner v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Baker v. HammettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
3Cited by16 opinions
- Fibikowski v. FibikowskiSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Bobier v. HornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Bryant v. MahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Nissen v. SabinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Maynard v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.