Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Joint Sch. Dist. No. 331 Minidoka

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1983No. 14753PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

The plaintiff Monte Robinson brought an action to recover an additional ten percent of his base salary for the 1978-79 school year which he alleged was due under a policy of the Joint School District No. 331 to pay such an additional amount to teachers who taught six class periods each day. Robinson appeals from a decision of the district court which reversed on appeal a decision of the magistrate awarding judgment in favor of Robinson for compensation allegedly due pursuant to a policy of the District to pay teachers required to teach six class periods a day a salary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nicholls v. BlaserIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Hawkins v. HawkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Buhl Education Ass'n v. Joint School District No. 412Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Olson v. Ada CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Independent School District v. C. B. Lauch Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Griggs v. NashIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. KennerIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Matter of Baby Boy DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Farnsworth v. Dairymen's Creamery Ass'nIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. State v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 2008

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API