Garrison v. Bonfield
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McGHEE, Justice.
The appellant filed claim for workmen’s compensation in statutory form for an injury claimed to have been received while working for Bonfield in a retail lumber yard at Hobbs, New Mexico.
The answer denied the claimant suffered an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment while working for the employer, denied claimant suffered any disability, and pleaded by way of new matter:
“1. They deny that the Defendant Joe Bonfield was at the time of the injury complained of engaged in one of the extra hazardous occupations or pursuits set forth in the Workmen’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Keeney v. BeasmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
- Yeomans v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
- L. E. Marks Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Eaves v. Contract Trucking Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
- Lester v. Auto Haulaway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hogue v. WurdackMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
- Orcutt v. S & L Paint Contractors, Ltd.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- Orcutt v. S & L Paint Contractors, Ltd.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- Montano v. WilliamsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- Quintana v. Nolan Bros., Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.