Legal Opinion

L. E. Marks Co. v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 27, 1933PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Dietzman

Affirming.

The appellee, having received an injury in the course of and arising out of his employment with the appellant, made application before the Workmen’s Compensation Board- for the adjustment of an asserted claim for compensation. The board, held that -the employer had not elected to operate under the Compensation Act, and dismissed the appellee’s claim. On an appeal to the circuit court, it ruled that the employer' either had elected to operate under the Workmen’s; Compensation Act or was estopped to deny that he had. so elected, and since it was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ramey Fidelity Guaranty Company v. BroadyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  2. Ramey v. BroadyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
  3. Bannon v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hogue v. WurdackMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Dick v. International Harvester CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1958
  3. Nugent Sand Co. v. HargesheimerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  4. McGehee Hatchery v. GunterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  5. Travelers Ins. Co. v. DudleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API