Legal Opinion

Wall v. McNee

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 29, 1937No. 8120PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

The decree appealed from adjudged unconstitutional as applied to the complainant-appellee Janet McNee, because impairing the obligation of her contract as a bond creditor of St. Lucie Inlet District and Port Authority, a statute of Florida enacted in 1933 (Acts Fla. 1933, c. 16252), which made “bonds or matured interest coupons of all counties or other taxing districts receivable at par and in lieu of money in redemption of tax-sales certificates or other evidences of tax liens held in the name of the State * * * for all purposes other than the levy made for State…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Louisiana v. PilsburySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Ledegar v. BockovenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Butts Ragan v. PeacockSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  4. Townsend Burns Ridgeway v. PeacockSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  5. Cranberry Creek Drainage District v. La VigneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. James Alexander, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
  2. Brooklyn Nat. League Baseball Club v. PasquelDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API