Legal Opinion

In re Jason R.

New York City Family Court

Decided November 24, 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

*921OPINION OF THE COURT

Philip C. Segal, J.

In this juvenile delinquency proceeding, respondent moves, inter alia, to preclude the offer of his prior inculpatory statement at the fact-finding hearing. For the following reasons, the motion is granted.

The present petition supersedes a prior petition which alleged the commission of the same criminal acts but was dismissed for facial insufficiency (see, e.g., Matter of Tommy C., 182 AD2d 312 [2d Dept 1992]). The presentment agency does not dispute that, contrary to statutory requirements, notice of intent to offer respondent’s statement was not served…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. O'DohertyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. In re Frank C.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. People v. BriggsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. People v. BernierNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API