People v. Bernier
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant was convicted after a jury verdict of two counts of robbery and of possession of a weapon arising out of the holdup of the same Brooklyn gas station on three separate occasions.
Defense counsel learned during trial jury selection that a person with respect to whom no CPL 710.30 (1) pretrial notice had been given would be called as the prosecution’s main *1008identifying witness. He then made a motion to preclude the testimony based on lack of notice and surprise. Inasmuch as the People failed to present…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. O'DohertyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. McMullinNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. AmparoNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
3Cited by52 opinions
- People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. OcasioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. Riley-JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.