Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Raemisch

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 2016No. Court of Appeals No. 14CA1424PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JUDGE BERGER

1 1 Plaintiff, Keith Clayton Brooks, Jr., an inmate in the custody of the Colorado Department of Corrections (DOC), appeals the district court judgment affirming two decisions by pmson officials limiting the number of future grievances "Brooks could file. On May 3, 2011, and agam on September 7, 2011, officials temporamly limited Brooks's gmev— ance filing based on determinations that he had recently filed multiple frivolous grievances '

[ 2 Addressing an issue of fil st i unpressmn, we first conclude that prison officials engage in "quasi-judicial" action when they decide…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Western United Realty, Inc. v. IsaacsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  4. Department of Health v. DonahueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  5. Cherry Hills Resort Development Co. v. City of Cherry Hills VillageSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marshall P. BROWN, in his official capacity as Director of Water of the City of Aurora, Colorado v. WALKER COMMERCIAL, INC., a Colorado corporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API