Legal Opinion
Walling v. McCrady Const. Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 28, 1945No. 2394PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.
This is an action brought pursuant to Section 17 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, c. 676, 52 Stat. 1060, 29 U.S. C.A. § 201 et seq. (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”), to restrain defendant from violating Sec. 15(a) (2) of the Act, 29 U.S. C.A., § 215(a) (2).
*245The case, which was heard on complaint, answer, and proofs, presents the question of whether certain employees of defendant, who were admittedly paid less than the minimum overtime rates, are within the meaning of the Act. If they are, then the plaintiff is entitled to an injunction to restrain…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- James v. Dravo Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Keen v. Mid-Continent Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1945
- Wesley E. Archer v. Brown & Root, Inc., and T. L. James & Co., Inc., D/B/A Louisiana Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Tobin v. Alstate Const. Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
- Hartmaier v. LongSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Mitchell v. SingstadDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.