Legal Opinion

Rakoszynski v. Rakoszynski

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Howard Miller, J.

Motion by plaintiff to hold defendant in contempt, and cross motion by defendant for reargument of a prior motion for pendente lite support and confirmation of an arbitration award.

It is ordered that the motion to hold defendant in contempt is denied; and it is further ordered that the cross motion for re-argument is granted, and upon reargument, the September 10, 1997 order of this court is modified with respect to child sup*510port solely to the extent that defendant shall not be required to pay the children’s school tuition of $1,666 per month. Except as so…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Finlay v. FinlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. In Re the Arbitration Between Susquehanna Valley Central School District & Susquehanna Valley Teachers' Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Port Washington Union Free School District v. Port Washington Teachers Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. People Ex Rel. Herzog v. MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. Hirsch v. HirschNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hirsch v. HirschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Hampton v. HamptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Becher v. BecherNew York Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API