Rakoszynski v. Rakoszynski
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Howard Miller, J.
Motion by plaintiff to hold defendant in contempt, and cross motion by defendant for reargument of a prior motion for pendente lite support and confirmation of an arbitration award.
It is ordered that the motion to hold defendant in contempt is denied; and it is further ordered that the cross motion for re-argument is granted, and upon reargument, the September 10, 1997 order of this court is modified with respect to child sup*510port solely to the extent that defendant shall not be required to pay the children’s school tuition of $1,666 per month. Except as so…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Finlay v. FinlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- In Re the Arbitration Between Susquehanna Valley Central School District & Susquehanna Valley Teachers' Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Port Washington Union Free School District v. Port Washington Teachers Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People Ex Rel. Herzog v. MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Hirsch v. HirschNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hirsch v. HirschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Hampton v. HamptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Becher v. BecherNew York Supreme Court · 2000