Legal Opinion

Becher v. Becher

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

William Rigler, J.

Pro se defendant Yehuda Becher moves, for counsel fees and plaintiff Mina Becher moves for sanctions.

Lost in the requests for relief~hut raised in the-motion papers and at oral argument, is the issue of whether or not the court should enforce an alleged preliminary antenuptial agreement that forbids all resort to this court unless by permission of a Rabbinical Tribunal, but where the alleged agreement recited that it would be followed by a comprehensive antenuptial agreement, which was never done.

As an initial matter, the requests for relief in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cohen v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Lipsius v. LipsiusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Lazard Freres & Co. v. First National Bank of MarylandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Rakoszynski v. RakoszynskiNew York Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Torres v. SpeiserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Newman v. NewmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API