Legal Opinion

Berryman v. Fettig Canning Corp.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 4, 1980No. 2-779A223PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Industrial Board denying workmen’s compensation benefits to claimant-appellant Marguerite L. Berryman. Her sole assignment of error is that the award in favor of defendant-appellee Fettig Canning Corporation is contrary to law.

The award of the single hearing member which was adopted by the Board reads in pertinent part as follows:

“STIPULATIONS

At the hearing, it was agreed by and between the parties and stipulated as follows:

1. That on or about September 30, 1977, Plaintiff was an employee of the Defendant at an average weekly wage of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Union Sanitary Manufacturing Co. v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Penn-Dixie Steel Corp. v. SavageIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Davies v. RobinsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Armstead, Widow, Etc. v. Sommer, Etc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1956

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Perez v. United States Steel Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Global Construction, Inc. v. MarchIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Springston v. IML Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1985
  4. Sally Thompson, Widow of Dennis Thompson v. York ChryslerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API