Legal Opinion

Sanz v. Douglas Collins Construction

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 4, 2006No. 05-117PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Claimant Antonio Sanz appeals the Commissioner of Labor and Industry’s denial of his request for a lump sum payment of his permanent total disability (PTD) workers’ compensation benefits. The Commissioner concluded that a 2000 amendment to 21 V.S.A. § 652 allowing PTD benefits to be paid in a lump sum was a substantive change to the law that could not be given retroactive effect. Claimant argues that the Commissioner erred in not applying the statute as amended. We affirm.

¶ 2. The relevant facts of this case are not disputed. Claimant was seriously injured on January 30,1998, when, in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Myott v. MyottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  2. Wesco, Inc. v. SorrellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  3. Montgomery v. Brinver Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  4. In re T. L. S.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  5. Longe v. Boise Cascade Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Eustance Act 250 Juris. Opinion (No. 2-231)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  2. John West v. North Branch Fire District 1Supreme Court of Vermont · 2021
  3. Smiley v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  4. Windham County Sheriff's Department v. Department of LaborSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  5. op21-179.pdfSupreme Court of Vermont · 2022

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API