Sausalito Bay Land Co. v. Sausalito Improvement Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Bishop, Hoefler, Cook & Harwood, and Finlay Cook, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff sued the defendant to quiet title to two parcels of land. The complaint is in the usual form, alleging title and possession in plaintiff and that defendant claims an interest in the land without right.
The defendant, by cross-complaint sets up a claim for damages against the plaintiff under an executory agreement for the sale of the land made by the plaintiff and defendant on October 24, 1890. The plaintiff at that time was the owner of the land. It desired to dispose of the same and for that purpose the officers and stockholders of plaintiff formed and organized the defendant…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Lawrence v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Buell v. Buckingham & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- Booth v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
- Gray v. DoughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Lemle v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Lemle v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Hoyt v. HampeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Kerr v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Mintle v. SylvesterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.