Legal Opinion

Haygood v. Haygood

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 16, 2019No. 52,435-CAPublished

1Opinion of the CourtMccallum, J.

*1228Blane Haygood appeals the judgment of the trial court asserting two errors: (1) the trial court erred when it signed a judgment pursuant to a stipulation that he alleges was made in error; and (2) the trial court erred when it denied his motion for new trial without holding a hearing.

For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court's judgment.

FACTS

Rhonda Haygood ("Rhonda") and Blane Haygood ("Blane") were formerly married. In the divorce proceedings, they entered into an oral stipulation regarding the partition of their community property. The attorney for Rhonda recited the stipulation…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  3. Peironnet v. Matador Resources Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2013
  4. Sonnier v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  5. Walker v. Hixson Autoplex of Monroe, L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API