Legal Opinion

Arellano v. Blahnik

District Court, S.D. California

Decided October 28, 2020No. 3:16-cv-02412Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAUL ARELLANO, Case No.: 16cv2412-CAB-MSB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO 13 v. BE SENT COPIES OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS [Doc. No. 167] 14 BLAHNIK, 15 Defendant. 16 17 On October 27, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion to be sent print out of certain 18 documents. [Doc. No. 167.] Specifically, Plaintiff requests a copy of Docket Nos. 8, 13 19 and 15. [Doc. No. 167 at 2.] 20 While “prisoners have a constitutional right of access to the courts,” Bounds v.

21 Smith, 430

U.S. 817, 821 (1977), there is no…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Tabron v. GraceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. MacCollomSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Reynolds v. WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  5. Norman E. Tedder v. Edward Odel, Cpl., James Scott McAlisterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API