PPG Industries, Inc. v. Ashland Oil Co.-Thomas Petroleum Transit Division
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WEIS, Circuit Judge.
Damage to cargo transported by water has been a subject of litigation since the dawn of nautical history, yet the legal problems engendered by this activity continue to perplex the courts. In this case, the carrier contends that once it established lack of responsibility for damage done to a barge’s hull as it struck a submerged object, the burden of proving negligence causing cargo damage shifted to the plaintiff shipper. The trial judge, however, charged the jury that the burden remained with the carrier to show due diligence in caring for the cargo…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- The Tj HooperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Schnell v. the VallescuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- The SilviaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hall v. Mississippi Chemical Exp., Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- Ppg Industries, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation v. Ashland Oil Company-Thomas Petroleum Transit Division, a Kentucky Corporation v. Canal Barge Company, Inc. And Inland River Transportation Corporation, Acorporation, and Dravo Corporation, Canal Barge Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978