Legal Opinion

Steuerwald v. Munn

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 21, 1919PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On bill, &c.

1Opinion of the Court

Foster, V. C.

This action was on a bill of interpleader, and the issue -was between materialmen on stop-notices served for debts claimed to be due from the contractor, or a subcontractor.

At the conclusion of the hearing on. March 28th, 1919, a, decree was advised by me, under which various claims were satisfied from the fund of $4,573.23 paid into court; and certain questions were reserved respecting the balance of about $986.34 still held for distribution and claimed by the defendants Munn, Lovely, South Amboy Lumber and Supply Company and Applegate.

The controversy between- them arises out of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fidelity v. McClintic-marshall CorpNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  2. Chesebro-Whitman Co., Inc. v. EDENBORO APTS.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  3. Arrow Builders Supply Corp. v. Hudson Terrace Apartments, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  4. Stahl v. WaltersNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API