Russell v. Roach
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Plaintiffs brought an action against Frederick Roach and Ida Roach, Bis wife, to impress a constructive trust upon a parcel of real estate in the city of Minneapolis designated as No. 116 Henne-pin avenue. Plaintiffs brought another action against Frederick Roach and Ida Roach, his wife, and Arthur M. Roach and Nellie Roach, his wife, to impress a constructive trust upon the funds received by defendants Frederick and Arthur for the sale of another parcel of real estate in the city of Minneapolis designated as No. 515 Hennepin avenue. The two actions were tried together. Near the end…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Crispo v. ConboySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Sons v. SonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Howell v. HowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
- Harney v. HarneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
3Cited by5 opinions
- McDonald v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
- True v. Citizens Fund Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Reek v. ReekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Brennan v. CarrollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Brennan v. CarrollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961