Legal Opinion

Reek v. Reek

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 4, 1931No. 28,554PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from the order denying a new trial, after a verdict finding that there had been no undue influence or duress exercised by defendants Edward Reek and his wife in obtaining the deed sought to be annulled in this action.

Wilhelm Reek and his wife, defendant Louisa Reek, were pioneer settlers in Renville county. They were thrifty and acquired lands. Three sons and two daughters grew to maturity in the home. One ’daughter is now dead, but her two daughters join in this action as plaintiffs with the two oldest sons, Albert and William, and the other daughter, Mrs. Fredrickson,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Taubert v. TaubertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  2. Zibble v. ZibbleMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Goodhue Farmers' Warehouse Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  4. Harriott v. HolmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  5. Hosford v. RoweSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pautz v. American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  2. True v. Citizens Fund Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API