Legal Opinion

City of Dayton v. Patrick

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 2018No. 27524PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtTucker, J.

{¶ 1} Laquisha Patrick is the owner of a dog, Nina. Patrick, on July 21, 2016, was at work leaving Nina with her 14 year old son. Nina, while supervised by Patrick's 14 year old son, attacked a neighbor's cat resulting in the cat's death. Patrick, as a result, was charged with a violation of Dayton Revised Code General Ordinance (R.C.G.O.) 91.50(A)(5). The trial court, following a bench trial, found Patrick guilty with this appeal following. We find, contrary to Patrick's argument, that her son's conduct does not insulate her from criminal liability for a violation of R.C.G.O. 91.50(A)(5). We…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. State v. Thaler, 22579 (10-24-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. State v. BreitensteinOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sate ex rel. Guthrie v. FenderOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API