City of Dayton v. Patrick
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtTucker, J.
{¶ 1} Laquisha Patrick is the owner of a dog, Nina. Patrick, on July 21, 2016, was at work leaving Nina with her 14 year old son. Nina, while supervised by Patrick's 14 year old son, attacked a neighbor's cat resulting in the cat's death. Patrick, as a result, was charged with a violation of Dayton Revised Code General Ordinance (R.C.G.O.) 91.50(A)(5). The trial court, following a bench trial, found Patrick guilty with this appeal following. We find, contrary to Patrick's argument, that her son's conduct does not insulate her from criminal liability for a violation of R.C.G.O. 91.50(A)(5). We…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. Thaler, 22579 (10-24-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. BreitensteinOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sate ex rel. Guthrie v. FenderOhio Court of Appeals · 2021