Legal Opinion
Brooks v. Baltz
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 28, 2000No. 95,169Published
1Opinion of the Court
12 P.3d 467 (2000)
2000 OK 73
Kenneth BROOKS, Petitioner,
v.
Tim BALTZ, Warden, Respondent, and
Shelly Rhodes, Real Party In Interest.
No. 95,169.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
September 28, 2000.
ORDER
¶ 1 Petitioner is in custody pursuant to an order of commitment on a verdict of guilty for indirect contempt of court arising from failure to pay child support. He challenges the order requiring support payments, alleging that he did not receive notice of the hearing on the order, and that the order erroneously determined that he had previously been adjudicated the father of the child involved. The Court…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Panama Processes, S.A. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Osprey L.L.C v. Kelly-Moore Paint Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- In Re PatswaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
- Heiman v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Matter of Estate of SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.